REVNI360

04 — Practice

Interfaces your engineers can build from — not static comps.

We design the interfaces and design systems engineering teams actually implement. Validation happens with real usability testing. Tokens, states, and accessibility are part of the deliverable, not a later audit.

In one sentence

Design systems, product UI, and usability testing with WCAG-minded delivery.

Who it is for

  • Product teams whose design and engineering speak different languages
  • Platforms with adoption problems, not just aesthetic ones
  • Regulated products that cannot treat accessibility as optional

Problems it solves

  • Comps that collapse in implementation
  • Inconsistent UI across squads
  • Low adoption of internal tools

Key benefits

  1. 01

    A system engineers can extend

  2. 02

    Fewer delivery rework cycles

  3. 03

    Interfaces validated with the people who use them

Process

  1. Gate 01

    Research the work, not the persona poster

    Watch how the product is actually used.

  2. Gate 02

    Design the system, then the screens

    Tokens and patterns before one-off layouts.

  3. Gate 03

    Test and hand over as implementation-ready

    States, empty, error, and accessibility included.

Deliverables

  • Design systems
  • Product UI
  • Usability testing
  • Accessibility audits

What we build with

Figma · Design tokens · WCAG audits

Questions

Do you deliver only Figma files?
No. The default is a system your engineers can build from — tokens, states, and pairing — not a deck of static frames.

Discuss this practice

Start with the process that costs you the most.

All practices →